Thursday, February 02, 2017

Everything happens so much


Especially these days. Grad school's already taken its toll on my ability to blog with any regularity, but you throw in Voldemort and the alien from Men In Black getting elected as President and Shadow President, respectively, and a lot of my internet time goes towards upkeeping Do The Thing.

This has been mildly frustrating, because I think this blog's been a useful outlet for me to organize my thoughts. Particularly, writing forces you to take a bunch of feelings and put them down on paper in a way that's somewhat coherent. I like it when my internal voices are somewhat coherent.

Oh, also, been posting a bunch on Facebook, which is frustrating too because it's up to The Facebook whether anyone sees your post, whether it sticks around, whether you can even go back and dig it up if you try... For writing text on pages, give me web 1.0 any day.

In order to preserve some of the weirdness that have been my thoughts over the last few months, thoughts which have been shifting from "pondering things every so often" to "activist mode, go!", I'm going to try to copy paste some of my facebookery here. So this will be long, and maybe not so useful to you.

Oct 26: Kraynick's Bike Shop!

Raising enough money on Gofundme to buy a building is... ambitious. But Kraynick's is a Pittsburgh treasure, the place that taught me the most about bike parts, a great place to get back on the road if you're not real rich, and the kind of diverse hangout that I see less and less often.
I'd always wondered what would happen when Jerry wanted to retire, and the answer is apparently this. Sounds like Rocky's going to keep the magic going, which is super exciting.

(Kraynick's fundraiser)
If you donate (any amount), let me know and I'll throw in another $10 per friend. Keep it goin'!

Nov 2

Hey. Canvassing in Pittsburgh. Saturday 10:30-2pm. 4250 Murray Ave (I think that's the greenfield giant eagle?).
Edit: not this particular canvass, instead signing up at 9am and noon (and maybe 3?) Talk to Aaron Tarnow, he can sign you up.
Mostly because 538 is freakin me out, doing something helps reduce anxiety, and I'd hate not to do whatever I can. Join me?

Nov 4

Hey, if you're in a safe state and voting Hillary, or in a swing state and voting third party... Consider vote trading? https://apps.trimian.com/nevertrump
Still send your signal of "I don't like them" but make it less likely to accidentally vote in Trump along the way.

Nov 5

Knocked on 175 doors for Hillary today

Nov 8: Vote a lot, y'all goons

And vote for the only presidential candidate remotely qualified to run for president
And your local Democratic congressers, because i guess that's the only way we're ever allowed to do anything again
(PS. I canvassed two more batches, in Ohio this time! "Be humble when you do good deeds"- Jesus or something. "Nope I'm braggin', sorry"- me)

Nov 8

et tu, pennsylvania?

Nov 10


Nov 10

just now, rando on street to lady: keep smiling!
me to rando: hey, don't tell her to smile!
rando: huh?
me: what's it matter if she smiles or not?
rando: I said, "keep smiling!"
me: uh (as that doesn't make any sense, and I hadn't really thought this far ahead, I walk away. clearly, I've got to practice this.)
I was surprised to learn that I guess this is a thing I do now. sharing not to boost myself, but to suggest you can do this too. if the wave of mini-trumps (people emboldened to be mean by one lar
ge meanman) is gonna happen, well, so is the wave of mini-anti-trumps.

(+ long interesting discussions! Kind of sad Facebook isn't saving those.)

Nov 11

If there's one good thing about all this, it's that I see more people getting more active online. More people than I've ever seen (in my circles) were phone banking, canvassing, vote volunteering, talking about local elections. Maybe we're not going to change anyone's mind by posting to our filter bubble. But if we can collectively use our filter bubbles to encourage each other to get active, and stay active, well... we've got a lot of power here.
In other words, in an increasingly scary world, we all gotta do politics now. And if you used to do Level 1 Politics, now you do Level 2 Politics, and so on.
Now let's keep it up, for four years or more. Do good things. Stop bad things. Talk about it. Support each other.

Nov 11

Why is "Smile!" bad? (It's not the Political Correctness police)

Nov 12

Got no phone till the 18th! (soonest the replacement battery can come in, if you'd believe it, even in the age of Amazon.)
This'll be interesting. I'll still get your texts and stuff when I get to my computer, but don't expect a quick response. (as if you were anyway :P)

Nov 14

How and why to contact your congress people:
http://www.house.gov/ has a nice "find your rep." Mine (most of SF) is Nancy Pelosi. Look on her site for her district office's phone number (I've heard that's better than the DC office). Hers is (415) 556-4862.
http://www.senate.gov/index.htm has a nice "find your senator." In CA ours are Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein. Their numbers are (510) 286-8537 and (415) 393-0707.
(They've also got email links, but phone makes for a better chance to listen, according to an internet thing going around.)
Anyway, call them all the time. Make them sick of hearing you. Right now I'm calling to get them to fight the appointment of Steve Bannon, the admittedly anti-semitic head of fact-free garbage fire Breitbart News. (tbh, I'm not even sure if they can do anything. If you've got better ways to fight this, let me know.)
Pittsburghers: your rep is Mike Doyle (412) 390-1499 and your senators are Bob Casey (412) 803-7370 and Pat Toomey (412) 803-3501.
Westlake Ohio folks: your rep is Jim Renacci (412) 803-3501 and your senators are Sherrod Brown (216) 522-7272 and Rob Portman 216-522-7095.
(edited to add Clevelanders and to get everyone's local numbers in there.)

Nov 14 Anti-Steve-Bannon call to action (<10 h4="" min="">1. Call your congress people!
SF: Rep. Pelosi (415) 556-4862, Sen. Boxer (510) 286-8537, Sen. Feinstein (415) 393-0707.
Pgh: Rep Doyle (412) 390-1499, Sen. Casey (412) 803-7370, Sen. Toomey (412) 803-3501
Tell them Bannon's a dangerous white supremacist who runs an irresponsible conspiracy theory website and deeply unqualified. (Even Glenn Beck agrees, FWIW.)
2. Call Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (202) 225-0600 and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (202) 224-2541, tell them the same thing.
3. If you're Jewish, call AIPAC at 202-639-5200. Dial 2 for a live person & then 2 for legislative affairs. Tell them you're an American Jew who won't stand for an anti-Semite in the White House and demand AIPAC speak out. (thanks Henry Kraemer! NB. he and I don't condone AIPAC as a whole, esp on Palestine; this is a subset from his post.)
4. Remember: this is step 1 in the million step march back to a reasonable country.
(disclaimer: I'm making this up as I go. let me know if there's a better way to do any of this.)

Nov 15 Step 2/1000000 back to a more reasonable country: elect Foster Campbell in Louisiana. 

He's a moderate Democrat senator in a last-minute runoff race (Dec 10), and electing him would push the senate from 52R-48D to 51R-49D.
How does this help "win the senate"? Well, right, Dems can't "control the senate", but in a time when every congressperson votes party line so often, needing only two moderate Republicans instead of three is a big difference.
Why do we need the senate? Well, the House is suuuper Republican, so the senate is kinda the last line of defense to stop crazy Trump idea number N.
Can we win this? Heck yeah. It's historically a low-turnout thing, so a little more voter turnout can turn it.
I'm still trying to figure out what to do. In the meantime I threw some money at him and signed up to phone bank. Here's more about him and here's his website

Nov 16 Step 3/1000000: back Planned Parenthood.

Because who knows what'll happen to their funding. And who knows what'll happen to women and their rights in this administration. Yesterday, I set up a recurring monthly donation. You probably have room in your budget to do so too.
ps. hate abortions? fine; you should back planned parenthood too. via birth control and education, they're probably stopping more abortions than any grandstanding "ban abortions!" politician.
pps. "dan, why send money to PP instead of malaria bed nets?" "fair question, dan; donating to where it can do the best good is usually the best call! I haven't quite figured this out yet, but two things: 1. I might not have the luxury of time to figure this out, and 2. this isn't coming out of my bed nets money."

Nov 17 Step 4/1000000: back the Southern Poverty Law Center. 

https://www.splcenter.org/ You can hit "donate" in the top right. They seem to be one of the leading voices stopping hate crimes and protecting rights of marginalized groups.
I suggest this today because I wanted to post something more like this: http://joshuafoust.com/this-is-not-normal/
... but that's not a concrete thing to do. But, I mean, read that essay.
Trump is not a normal president-elect. Look, conservative friends and family (if you're still with me here on facebook, and if so, thank you), I grumble plenty about republicans, but if you wanted to swap out Trump for Kasich/Rubio/Romney/McCain, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Those guys are normal politicians I tend to disagree with, but they wouldn't start World War 3 or Japanese Internment Camps 2 (Muslim Version).
Read also Sarah Kendzior, i.e. this tweet: https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/798904511054094336
She's a PhD anthropologist and journalist who's studied authoritarian regimes and sees us on exactly the same path.
Don't let anyone convince you this is normal now. Don't let anyone tell you to "give Trump a chance"; he's had a chance to talk to us ad nauseam for 12 months and he's given us a stream of consciousness of authoritarianism and hate.

Nov 18: Step 5/1535 (days until Jan 20, 2020): Call your congresspeople again.

Bookmark this list. (thanks to Stacey for bringing it to my attention.) Do the Weekly Call to Action.

B-side of this post: don't get distracted arguing about exactly what are all the problems with a Trump presidency and how big each one is. In particular, stop arguing how racist Trump himself is or isn't. Like this.
Trump's certainly got a real racist campaign. Is it 60/100 or 95/100 racist? Is he a 58% racist populist who mistakenly attracted David Duke and the KKK, or a 99% racist who's cloaking his words until he can finally ban all Muslims? Who cares! Bouie's right to say that racism and economic populism are intertwined, so the simple "well, we're with him on the jobs, but not on the racism" is a nice sentiment but doesn't make a ton of sense.
Agree with this. But don't let it stop you! Trump is a disaster in so many ways! And while you've been arguing about who gets a scarlet R stitched on their shirt, dude's nominating this guy  for National Security Advisor (in addition to the rest of these ding dongs), straight-up making up facts, and one of his people has threatened to criminalize any kinda mean ol' protest that stops us from the sacred act of shopping
More at SSC

C-side of this post: These next four years are going to demand holding a lot of balances in your mind and body. You're going to have to be angry enough to take action, but not so depressed that you shut down. You're going to have to be outraged along with black/hispanic/Muslim/female/LGBT friends, while not blowing up at white/white/Christianish/male/straight friends who are still learning and saying stuff that's on the right track but sorta missing a point. Patient and educating, and not patronizing. Confident enough to take action, but open to learning from people with more lived experience than you. It'll be emotionally hard work. Make sure you have the support you need, and be kind to those who are fighting the same fight in a slightly different way than you.
Ok, get back to it. Did you call your congresspeople yet?

Nov 19 Step 6/1535: back the ACLU.

I guess the congresspeople are out of the office today. I'm wondering what's the best thing to do on weekends - send them emails/website messages? do they even read those?
In the meantime, the ACLU does good work, and will be ever more necessary as our civil rights (and especially more marginalized people's) become more infringed under the autocrat-elect.
I'm recurring-donating. Give 'em what you can. If you're my facebook friend, you can probably afford another recurring donation. (don't worry, this won't become a habit.)

Nov 20: Step 7. Folks, we're almost 0.5% of the way there.

Here's a concrete thing you can do today: Trump's got a survey about what we want him to prioritize in his first 100 days. Naturally, most of the options are terrible. But if you vote "Not Important" on most of them and "Highly Important" on the couple semi-palatable ones, maybe he'll get busy with some medium-bad (or maybe even good) things and hold off on doing the worst of the worst? Here's the ones that to me sound not-terrible on their face: 9, 12, 20, 25, 26. If you want to stretch, 5 and 6 maybe wouldn't be as awful as immediately.
(My reasoning, which you can skip if you want: 9 and 20. Congressional term limits and bans on then becoming lobbyists for 5 years - sounds fine to me? 12. Deducting childcare and eldercare from taxes - like, I don't really like complicating the tax code _even more_ to do what we want, but it seems harmless enough. 25 and 26. Sure, help vets. Guess we can all agree on that. 5. his tax plan is basically "a lil tax cut for the middle class and a big tax cut for the rich like me" but seriously, get him busy with taxes and not banning Muslims. 6. "infrastructure" probably means "more roads for more cars", but like it might not?)
Thanks to Cole for pointing this out to me. Meta-question coming (in a separate post): should I make this series of "daily things to do" a blog or something more permanent?

Nov 20 Would you like me to start a daily blog of something you can do to fight Trump?

I've been posting for a week now, every day, a little step you can actually do. Emphasis on: action, kinda-quick things, specificity to my social circle (so like I'll post particularly PA and CA congresspeople), contribution from y'all, 80/20 benefit kind of things, large number of people doing a little bit things.
I'm thinking about making it a blog or other daily thing to keep that WTF fire going after our initial anger subsides.
Questions for you, and you can respond in comments or emoji/reactions (edit: oh hell you can only do one reaction, whoops, I'll try to edit descriptions so reaction-responses make sense. edit edit: "like" is overloaded - you might just read the first sentence and hit "like" - so now "I like this but I'm not sure if I'd subscribe" = "haha"):
- do you think I should do this, but you're not sure if you'd subscribe? (do a "haha" if so.)
- do you think I should do this, and you would subscribe? (do a "heart" if so.)
- blog or daily email newsletter?
- what platform? I think the couple of quick features I'd like are the ability to queue up posts (in case I'm traveling or something) and easily crosspost to facebook.
- should I not do this because it's obnoxious or self-aggrandizing? (feel free to do an "angry"/"sad" if so; promise not to look at who posted those, and if I accidentally see them, I honestly value your input.) I want to keep my ego very much out of this, and I'd even make it fully anonymous, unless my identity can help (b/c I know y'all, or because of my personal privilege and connections w/ privileged people).
- do you think this is a great idea, and you'd like to be part of a small "feedback group" where I'd bug you more often for help making little decisions about details of it? (do a "wow" if so; "heart" is in that case implied.)

Nov 21: 8/1535. Ok, your daily Thing To Do, and sorry it's so late: call again about the barrage of conflict-of-interest scandals.

What to do: pick three people from this list:
https://oversight.house.gov/subcommittee/full-committee/
I called Mike Turner (OH) (937) 225-2843
Brendan Boyle (PA) (215) 517-6572
Ted Lieu (CA) (323) 651-1040
(I would say call the House Oversight Committee 202-225-5074 and Rep Jason Chaffetz at (801) 851-2500 but their voice mails are full. Which outrages me on a different level, of course.)
Script:
I'm ---- ----- , a constituent calling to let the commitee know that I support Rep. Elijah Cummings's call for a bipartisan review of Trump's “financial arrangements” for potential conflicts of interest before he’s sworn in as president. Please ask Chairman Chaffetz to immediately begin conducting a review to ensure that President-elect Trump does not have any actual or perceived conflicts of interests. I want the Committee to make sure Trump and his advisors comply with all legal and regulatory ethical requirements.
(end script, but you can continue if you want.)
More context: Trump, who campaigned on "draining the swamp" and "crooked Hillary", either doesn't know or doesn't care about conflicts of interest between being president and running his business. In the last week, he's:
- Telling foreign diplomats to stay at his hotel
- Badgering Argentina to let him build a hotel
- Sending his business to his kids in a not-blind-trust, while his kids are on his transition team
- Meeting with Indian business partners about expanding his business, with his kids
This is defunct-government kleptocracy stuff.
Bonus points: call Paul Ryan 202-225-3031, press 2 for the Obamacare poll, and listen to a long spiel, and press 1 to say you support Obamacare.
(It's a real thing... AND the bill he's trying to pass to stop Obamacare also freezes funding to Planned Parenthood for a year. h/t Mark T. Tomczak)

Nov 22: 9/1535. Call your reps again. Protest Trump's transition team.

Remember how "Trump might not be that bad, because he'll surround himself with the best people?" Not at all happening.
Call your reps.
SF:
Dianne Feinstein (415) 393-0707
Barbara Boxer (510) 286-8537
Nancy Pelosi (415) 556-4862
Pittsburgh:
Bob Casey (412) 803-7370
Pat Toomey (412) 803-3501
Michael Doyle (412) 390-1499
(Reading from elsewhere? let me know.)
I made up this script myself.
"I am calling to ask that Rep/Sen _______ refuse to work with the Trump transition team until Steve Bannon and Jeff Sessions are removed from his staff.
Steve Bannon is a white supremacist who runs a fake news site.
Jeff Sessions is the most virulently anti-immigrant and anti-civil-rights congressperson, and immigrants are what make our country great.
In addition, we'd like to oppose the nepotism and brashness that's leading Trump to nominate Mike Pompeo and Michael Flynn. They're both unqualified and dangerous.
(for senators) Finally, I'm asking you to sign on to Jeff Merkley's letter against Bannon.
"
More on Sessions
Pompeo
Flynn
I remember reading an article about why concretely Pompeo and Flynn are train wrecks, but I don't remember details well enough to put em in the script. Let me know if you do.

Nov 23: 10/1535: ok bear with me, I don't think this is too foil-hat, but let me know

Please take one minute and call/email the DOJ - Department of Justice: 1-800-253-3931 (press 5) or 202-353-1555 (leave message) or email: voting.section@usdoj.gov and tell them to audit the vote.
Like, it's _possible_ (I'd give it 1%?) the election was hacked. (sci-fi stuff? well... we've had Russian hackers openly influencing the election (Podesta) already.) Halderman's article below explains how.
And if it were, the results are enormous. So call it a low (but not ultra-low) probability, high-effect action. (and like, auditing voting results isn't super expensive. why not?)
There'd be a huge fit if it turns out Clinton actually won and Trump isn't inaugurated. Riots. But I'd rather have riots now than four years of insanity.
(does the DOJ care? uh, that's unclear too.)
more

Nov 24 It's now officially thanksgiving, so I'll post 11/1535.

It's a day you might spend with family and/or friends. That's cool. Your congresspeople will not be at work, so no need to call. Instead, take this opportunity to:
- listen to "that uncle", if you get a chance. You can listen thoroughly without agreeing. Listen harder. Listen for their feelings. They don't honestly care about Benghazi or private emails. Listen for what's making them say that, and try to understand that.
- but do not give in, and do not agree! Trump is not normal. Trump is not "just another president" you disagree with, as everyone in your life until now has been. After you listened _so hard_, they will do some listening to you. (usually.) They will probably respect some of the arguments you make, especially if you can distance from "politics as usual." (Make it clear that you'd swap for a Romney or McCain in a heartbeat.)
- and, like, take a break a bit? We're in it for the long haul, not the sprint, so the occasional breather is probably healthy.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/opinion/no-trump-we-cant-just-get-along.html

Nov 25 DAY 12 OF 1535 days until we get sane again: Call your reps again. 

Is it a holiday? I don't even know! Leave a message. (technically this post is for Friday but I'll be gone most of the day so I'm posting early.)
First, your House rep. Urge them to support and speak out about Katherine Clark's HR 6340, the Presidential Accountability Act. Makes the President and VP stop doing business that they would benefit from while in office (as is the case for every other elected official.)
SF: Nancy Pelosi (415) 556-4862
PGH: Michael Doyle (412) 390-1499
Others: http://usecalltoaction.com/
While you're at it, get in a jab on Jeff Sessions. Because he's the gosh dang worst: “As sworn testimony revealed, Mr. Sessions had referred to the N.A.A.C.P. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference as “un-American” and “Communist inspired.” He had joked that he thought the Ku Klux Klan was “O.K.” until he discovered some of its members smoked pot, and had accused a white attorney who supported voting rights of being a race traitor.”
Then call your senators and tell them to oppose Sessions too.
"I'm (name), and I'm calling to ask (senator's name) to denounce and oppose the appointment of Jeff Sessions, because he's a terribly racist, anti-immigrant, and anti-civil-rights congressperson."
SF:
Dianne Feinstein (415) 393-0707
Barbara Boxer (510) 286-8537
Pittsburgh:
Bob Casey (412) 803-7370
Pat Toomey (412) 803-3501
Interested to do more, maybe call the following senators to oppose Sessions too? They're on the Judiciary committee but not terribly pro Trump.
Senator Jeff Flake (R — AZ): (202) 224–4521
Senator Lindsey Graham (R — SC): (202) 224–5972
Senator Michael S. Lee (R — UT): (202) 224–5444
Finally, bonus points (unlikely to matter but super easy), click all these

Nov 26 Hey! Here is a thing to do for day 13/1535.

The simplest What To Do:
Call your senators
CA:
Dianne Feinstein (415) 393-0707
Barbara Boxer (510) 286-8537
PA:
Bob Casey (412) 803-7370
Pat Toomey (412) 803-3501
And tell them to pass an omnibus appropriations bill instead of a continuing resolution. This will ensure the funding for at least another year for important programs like the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), Family Violence Prevention Services Act (FVPSA) and Victims of Crime Act (VOCA).
But much more context in the thorough post below. Thanks to whoever brought it to my attention, and sorry I don't remember who it was! I will keep better track of your recommendations in the future.

Nov 27 ok y'all, 14/1535: Call about Trump appointees.

This time, shout out Bannon again, because dude definitely has to go. Another person to suggest your reps fight is Kris Kobach, hard-line anti-immigrant lawyer who keeps writing laws that get struck down as unconstitutional. He's not up for any job in particular yet but Trump's been meeting with him, so look out.

Nov 28

ello friends. it is day 15/1535 until Jan 20, 2021. (I'm not sure if my math is quite right.)
Today's task: give Foster Campbell some money. (Link below.)
He is the democrat senate candidate in Louisiana, and they're having a special runoff election in 2 weeks. If he wins, senate is 51R-49D. If not, it's 52-48. 51-49 means we only need to get two Republicans to change their mind on any ridiculous Trump thing, which is way easier than getting three.
If you want me to make even one more decision for you: give him $25. (If that is too much, no worries, give less.) I already gave him some money but I today gave him some more money.
Anyway, it's day 15/1535. I'm not sure if my math is quite right, but we are about 1% of the way there. It's like being at mile 0.26 of the marathon. We have a long way to go, but celebrate getting this far.

Nov 29 16/1535: it's Conflict Of Interest Day!

What to do:
1. email siggerudk@gao.gov, minellit@gao.gov, congrel@gao.gov.
Subject: Support Sen. Warren's Audit
Text:
Dear Ms. Siggerud and Mr. Minelli,
My name is (name), I'm a US citizen (or omit if appropriate; I don't know if this matters but I figure it must?), and I'm writing in support of Senator Elizabeth Warren's request for an audit of our incoming President Elect's finances, to prohibit conflicts of interest that would prevent him from carrying out the responsibilities of the office without corrupt influence.
Thank you very much,
Name
2. That was just an email, you're not getting off that easily. Pick someone on this list: http://www.foreign.senate.gov/about/committee-membership (I picked Flake. I think I'm gonna get to be good buddies with Flake.) and say:
My name is [NAME] and I am calling to let the Senate Foreign Relations Committee know that I support Senator Cardin’s resolution to ensure that our president-elect’s foreign dealings do not violate the US Constitution. Trump’s financial dealings could pose a threat to our national security.
3. Call the House Judiciary Committee at (202)225-3951 and say:
Hi, my name is [NAME]. I'm calling to express my strong concern about President-Elect Trump's many conflicts of interest. House Bill 6340 would require him to address these conflicts of interest. I strongly urge you to support this bill. Thank you.
4. pat yourself on the back and post a Haha or a comment! you have taken one tiny step towards fighting the ridiculous corruption that steps into the white house when Trump takes office. (Again, this is not a Republicans vs Democrats thing. Trump is _already_ trying to boost his hotels with the presidency, the kind of thing that happens in undeveloped kleptocracies. It's never been like this here.)
Shout out to Stacey K's Weekly Calls group, Natalya from said group, and Rebecca Solnit.

Nov 29

hey, do you think mainstream culture imposes a double standard on whites, and puts us in impossible situations where anything we might say or do is wrong?
if so, I propose a trade for you: read this, by a much better writer than me: https://weeklysift.com/2016/11/28/should-i-have-white-pride/
and I'll read an article of your choice.

Nov 30 17/1535: Two things.

1. ah geez keep calling about all the frickin trump appointees. today, the following three:
Tom Price, Sec of Health: http://gizmodo.com/trump-s-pick-for-health-secretary-is-tot…
Steven Mnuchin, Sec of Treasury. http://www.vanityfair.com/…/steven-mnuchin-foreclosure-mach…
Betsy DeVos: http://networkforpubliceducation.org/…/tell-your-senator-t…/
Your Senators:
SF:
Dianne Feinstein (415) 393-0707
Barbara Boxer (510) 286-8537
Pgh:
Bob Casey (412) 803-7370
Pat Toomey (412) 803-3501
Script I just made up:
Hi, my name is (name) and I'm a constituent living in (city). I'd like to ask senator (X) to oppose Trump appointees Tom Price, Steven Mnuchin, and Betsy DeVos. Price consistently votes against women's rights and will lead to millions losing health coverage, Mnuchin is a Goldman Sachs banker who ran a foreclosure machine OneWest (which is particularly frustrating given Trump's promise to "drain the swamp"), and DeVos is an enemy of public education who will further defund our already-hurting public schools. Thanks.
2. Read (at least part of) this article by George Lakoff. (You may know him from his book "Don't think of an elephant.") If you only have a moment, jump to the end, where he provides three new terms we can converge on to discuss Trump smartly:
- Loser/Minority President
- Betrayer of Trust
- Corrupt
Republicans always (at least in my lifetime) do memes better than Democrats. (god, even just think of "crooked hillary", when by _any_ measure Trump himself is wayyyy more crooked.) We've got to start fighting back as smartly as they fight. Loser, Betrayer, and Corrupt are three solid memes that

Dec 1 18/1535: phone bank for Foster Campbell.

(the democrat Louisiana senator who's got a runoff election in 9 days, and who could tip the senate from "very very difficult to stop anything trump does ever" to "just very difficult".)
Try this link http://action.lademo.org/…/711064…/60a8ee7f/2092074282/VEsH/
and if we're lucky, it'll connect you to their campaign on this crazy online speed-dialing thing. Apparently you just do the talking and that's it. Seems like a super rapid-fire way to call a lot of people and maybe pick up a few votes. Just do it for 5 minutes.
If that link doesn't work, sign up on http://www.fostercampbell2016.com/volunteer for "digital phone bank."
Disclaimer: I am sad to say that this is the first day I didn't (yet) do the thing I'm telling you all to do, because I don't have a phone, because of this dumb three week saga of companies failing at things. Long story. As soon as I get a new phone, though, I'll make up for it by doing 10 minutes.
Your moment of hope: it's no longer November 2016. November has been The Worst Month I can remember: we apparently elected a corrupt minority president, we got bedbugs, and to top it off I grew this awful mustache goatee thing for Movember. Shout out to all of you dealing with prostate cancer, or dealing with someone who has it; also, shout out to it not being the Worst Month anymore. Clean shaven again and looking to a better December.

Dec 2 19/1535: Gotta get up early tomorrow so I'm posting this one early. How about trying a letter to the editor?

For example, to the Cleveland Plain Dealer
or the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Here's the crummy janky letter I came up with on the spot. I include this although it makes me cringe, in order to encourage you. You don't have to be a Shakespeare to write a letter. Just keep it short and not crazy. Today I tried out writing about corruption, because under Trump there'll be a lot of it.
Letter for the Plain Dealer
President-elect Trump will enter office with a monumental stream of conflicts of interest. As just two examples, he's got a $950M loan with the Bank of China and a party by the Kingdom of Bahrain at his hotel. In the meantime, he's not selling his business interests or putting them in a blind trust, he's giving them to his children.
I've lived in Cleveland most of my life and know that this city won't stand for this kind of corruption. Please call Sen. Portman at 216-522-7095 and Sen. Brown at 216-522-7272 and urge them to support Ben Cardin's resolution, "Urging Trump to Comply with Constitution by Truly Severing Relationship with Private Business", and the Presidential Accountability Act.

Dec 2

Finally got my phone back. Finally #krabbin again, for great justice.

Dec 3 20/1535 (early post for Saturday): Phone bank for Foster Campbell (Louisiana senator) again. 

Just another 5 minutes. I finally got a phone so I did it today. It's kind of hard, because I dislike bugging people, but kind of fun. The system handles a lot of the nitty gritty of dialing. OR if you really can't bring yourself to phone, donate another $5. Why today? Because it's the last day of early voting in Louisiana. (Why is there a gap between Early Voting and Actual Voting? beats me.)
Yeah, it's one tiny piece of one race, which is one tiny piece of the Senate. But it's something, and you're doing it today, and that's awesome. In addition, it's a tangible thing for a real race; enjoy it, we won't have that again for a while.
We're about due for a Call Your Reps again, but it's a weekend, and anyway I'm trying to figure out how best to contact your reps. I'm wondering if calling the ones who agree with you all the time is the best way to do it. Also trying to figure out if it matters if you call someone where you don't live. I guess your congresspeople are only supposed to listen to their constituents, but... unless they ask (and some do ask) how do they know?
Anyway, if any of you have ever worked in a congressperson's office, or know someone who has (besides Emily Ellsworth's excellent tweet-series going around), let me know.

Dec 4 21/1535. Call A Republican Congressperson Day!

Call Pat Toomey at (814) 453-3010 and urge him to pressure Trump to clean up his conflicts of interest, and oppose Donald McGahn in particular. McGahn is the recent appointee for White House Counsel, and one would think he'd be the one to keep Trump as minimally corrupt as possible, but if you read a bit about him, you'll understand why I'm dubious that will happen.
OTOH, call Rep Justin Amash ("a-mosh") (R-MI) at (616) 451-8383 and thank him for being one of the rare Republican dissenters who's not falling in line behind everything Trump does. He's been at least speaking up against Trump's more egregious mistakes. Thank him for speaking up about issues like Trump's conflicts of interest and not imposing arbitrary penalties on flag burning, and urge him to translate his tweets into action.
(and before you say it, yep, Amash has flaws! But he's doing one thing right, and that's a start.)
Link 1 Link 2
No scripts, you can go it alone!

Dec 5 22/1535: hey I made a mailing list. Go sign up.

Also made a website: http://www.dothething.info
Daily conflict of interest mess: call General Services Administration Administrator Denise Roth at 202.501.0800 and Inspector General Carol Ochoa at 202.501.0450 to ask them to end their business relationship with Trump and his family, because of the $180 million lease he's got on the Old Post Office Pavilion.
(does this seem like small potatoes? like, what's $180 million when he's got the entire $trillions US budget to deal with? well, I figure, he's going to try to direct those trillions to increase his millions, and that's going to hurt us all.)
More info and a list that looks good to sign up for
bonus points: sign a petition

Dec 6 23/1535: We're gettin' into the weeds again, but...

Write a polite letter to a member of the electoral college that's pledged for Trump, and ask them not to vote for him. Conveniently, here's a list of the Pennsylvania electors and their addresses. Conveniently also, there's no law in PA against "faithless electors", so they can legally vote how they want.
For the ones with "@pagop.org" addresses, you can imagine they probably won't vote for Hillary. But perhaps you can appeal to them to vote for John Kasich or someone else. If we get them under 270, I guess the House decides who's president, and I mean a Kasich/Rubio/whoever presidency wouldn't be great, but it'd be better than this clown.
I just hand wrote three gosh darn letters, and it is a rough day when you've got me writing paper letters. Don't let me down here.
Bonus points: reserve tickets to Trump rallies so there are empty seats (More)
Also: sign up for the mailing list at http://www.dothething.info!

Dec 7 24/1535: Climate day

First of all, sign up for this mailing list: http://www.dothething.info
and get these posts as email. I'll be out of town for the weekend so might not facebook-post for a few days but I've got some good stuff queued up, so make sure to get the email to continue doing the thing.
Back to the main story:
One thing I want not to focus on is daily news blah. Especially in the Trump era, where he can tweet "Donuts are good!" and then the day's news is preempted by thinkpieces, polls, and hot takes about whether donuts are actually good. (Some recent examples include Hamilton and Air Force One.) We've got to stay on top of what's more important.
With that in mind, get back on the phone. Call your reps and ask them to promote this letter from 800 scientists and Scientific American asking Trump to take climate change seriously.
Or you can summarize:
- publicly acknowledge human-caused global warming is happening and is a big threat to avoid being the only world leader denying it
- promise not to renege on the Paris climate agreement

Dec 8

Another day, another KRABBY, bringing the spirit of Pittsburgh to SFO

Dec 9 25/1535: Phone bank for Foster Campbell again

Reminder: Louisiana has a funny election where there's one more runoff vote for senate on Dec 10. Foster Campbell, democrat, might win the last senate seat up for grabs. That would be a good thing.
Sign up for their mailing list, selecting "Digital phone bank", and you'll get an email with instructions (probably today but maybe tomorrow?). It's pretty easy and like kind of fun. Do it for 5 minutes, or 10.
(Want this as an email with links? Subscribe at http://www.dothething.info)
Dec 10
For the Rodriguez-Rozas-Botran wedding, or "Boda RRB", I figure an appropriate thing is to post a k(RR)a(B)y. Congrats Cristina y Juanma!

Dec 12 29/1535: wait Russia meddled with our friggin elections

ok, so the CIA says "yep it was Russia who leaked Hillary's campaign manager's emails" and Trump's like "I dunno, that CIA, they're probably biased."
I try to highlight things where I think the GOP and Dems should agree, and this seems like one of them. ("but you would say that, b/c you're a democrat" -- I kinda wish it was the Democrats who'd gone bonkers so I'd be more credible here. let's be clear: if Russia had gotten Hillary elected, that'd be just as terrifying.)
What do we do about this? I don't know, and that's part of the reason it took me so long to get out today's post. I think this is the most important news that came out over the weekend, but not super actionable.
I guess, call:
Sen Lindsay Graham (R-SC) (864) 250-1417
Sen John McCain (R-AZ) (520) 670-6334
Sen Mitch McConnell (R-KY) (502) 582-6304
and say something like "Thanks for pointing out that it's important that Russia meddled in our elections. The influence of any other country in our most sacred of institutions should not be tolerated. Please continue to push Trump on this. Also, please reject Rex Tillerson, Exxon Mobil CEO and official friend of Russia, because his ties to Russia and Putin would have dangerous effects on our democracy."
Bonus points: Lamar Smith, chair of House Committee on Science etc, has a survey about "What should our priorities be?"
click "Other" and type "Climate change mitigation" (thanks Caitlin!)

Dec 13 30/1535: Michael Flynn, Security Advisor and Conspiracy Theorist

(reminder: http://www.dothething.info if you want to get more of these in your email - and I may stop posting them on facebook at some point)
Anyway, Flynn is Trump's pick for National Security Advisor. He keeps spreading rumors of "Shariah Law" spreading throughout the US, which sounds scary but is absolutely false. More about the guy: seems ok with torture, friend of Russia, fired from the DIA.
(ok, I lied. if you read the first article I linked, turns out _his son_ is the worst. Flynn Jr is a fan of obnoxious conspiracy site Infowars, recently tweeted to spread rumors of Pizzagate, which led to someone shooting an assault rifle at a pizza place based on ridiculous conspiracy theories that Hillary and friends were running a child sex ring from said pizza place.) (seriously!) (the podcast Reply All has an entertaining recap of it) (Flynn Jr is no longer officially working with their transition team, though, so feel free to disregard this paragraph if that seems more fair.)

Flynn Jr's Pizzagate or Flynn Sr's Shariah, this kind of thing is particularly worrisome because believing in nutty conspiracy theories undercuts any other logical thinking. If you're Trump and your advisors are whispering how half of Florida and Texas and Michigan are all under Shariah law because of the creeping influence of "Radical Islamic Terror", how can you possibly make sane choices? How can you avoid being crummy to US Muslims and starting another war with ISIS or the brown-skinned enemy du jour?

Sadly, this position doesn't require Senate confirmation. Still, there's resistance to him, which I guess means something. Add to that resistance, I suppose, by calling your folks.

Dec 14: 32/1535: Become an Editor of Do The Thing

Hi friends! I'm noticing a problem in my research for Do The Thing: the well of actionable, useful, bipartisan-ish, easy-to-find things to do is only so deep. This is likely because I'm trying to read all the news, so I don't get much depth into any particular issue. I could use your help to develop that depth.
You can help by becoming a co-editor. This would mean:
You take one day of the week and one big issue. (for example: corruption, authoritarianism, climate change, racial justice, women's rights, international relations, you name it.)
We all get access to this Mailchimp account and you log in whenever and post one thing a week.
Try to follow the guidelines on the website under "What's in a Do The Thing email" but even those are just guidelines. (and you're not limited to the topic you pick.)
For your weekly time commitment, I'm thinking no more than 2 hours, and it's totally whenever you have spare time and an internet connection. Plus, if it turns out you can't do it after a couple months, no worries, we just find a replacement.
We've got over 62 people in 15 states subscribed and doing stuff now, and it keeps steadily growing. Help keep this group's awesome momentum going and level up to a Level 2 Activist yourself.
(still could use two more, and most topic areas are pretty open!)

Dec 17

Hey I guess install this browser extension to help stop fake news a little bit. Not gonna fix the problem but it seems likely to help sort of.
(By the way, did I mention sign up for http://www.dothething.info?)

Dec 19

On a less political note, I finished a new bike. Details
But remember: everything in our government is still on fire! Sign up for this: http://www.dothething.info
(now written by not just me but also 7 people who are smarter and better writers than me)

Dec 20 We wish you a KRABBY Christmas


Dec 21 Scene: in airport, killing time.

Dan: oh there's a Brookstone, we can go look at some useless stuff!
Tati: what's a Brookstone? What do they sell?
Dan: like I said, useless stuff.
Tati: like what?

Dec 22

Trump again, and I'm tryin' to be bipartisan again. (I'm a lefty and I'm worried that he's gonna kill Obamacare and our public schools and etc., but whatever.)
I'm more worried about World War 3.
http://reverbpress.com/politics/biggest-threat-trump-presidency-need-start-preparing/
He could bungle China into war (seeing as his current stance is "who needs diplomacy?"), allow another 9/11 ("who needs intelligence briefings?"), bungle Iran into war (seeing as he and his folks all hate anything less than bullying Iran into submission), or let the next Russian land grab turn into a NATO-splitting war. If/when any of those happen, please don't fall for it.
(how'd I do on bipartisan? does it matter? is anyone who disagrees listening?)

Dec 27

Ok, so I'm all out of Trump voters on my newsfeed, it seems, so back to rallying our friends instead of trying to convince the few outliers.
The first thing I'm most afraid of in Trump's America is blundering into World War 3. But the second thing I'm most afraid of is a broad campaign of moving goalposts. Remember: it wasn't Obama causing "gridlock." A "climate contrarian" is a climate change denier. The "alt-right" are white supremacists. We are all in bubbles, not just one "liberal bubble." Those of us who sometimes pay four dollars for coffee are not the "elites."
But Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie says it better than me. Read her article instead.

Dec 28

Feeling Beatley today. Also feeling, as always, KRABBY.

Dec 31 Semi-contrarian news sources: who do you like?

I like the following:
The Economist, which I just started Paying Dollars For, which seems centrist to the point of boring, sometimes mildly conservative, sometimes what we in the US would call "liberal" and what most of Europe would call "centrist."
Slate Star Codex, the wonderful blog of Scott Alexander, who talks about important issues in depth AND understands statistics. Sometimes I disagree with him. Sometimes I start off disagreeing with him and end up agreeing with him! Or at least, realizing that I might be wrong. Here's a sampler on vouchers vs public schools. SSC reminds me that, yeah, I generally believe the standard US liberal position on most things. But some things very strongly (climate change is real and we should work hard to stop it now) and some things kinda weakly (having good, well-funded public schools seems like the best way? but I am not very sure of that.)
Chris Arnade at the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/profile/chris-arnade
Guy gives a great view into "the forgotten corners of the US", where it did indeed seem like America needed to be "made great again."
I like to read sources like this. I am not inclined to just "read Breitbart or Fox or some right wing news so you know what the right wing is feeling", because, I mean, you won't learn what I'm thinking by reading Daily Kos. But if you've got some smart news sources that make you occasionally think "yeah, huh, maybe I'm wrong here", let me know. (bonus points if they're RSS-able!)

Jan 3

The only thing making me hopeful this morning is turning on facebook and seeing that you all are sharing this too: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/us/politics/with-no-warning-house-republicans-vote-to-hobble-independent-ethics-office.html
This is the way the world ends, not with a bang but a series of unsexy but ruthlessly effective bureaucratic maneuvers.
(by the way CALL YOUR HOUSE REP NOW and tell them to vote against this abomination: "My name is (name) and I live in your district in zip code (zip) and I want Rep (name) to vote against the Goodlatte (pronounced "good-let") amendment, because it would weaken ethics oversight in the house. Independent watchdog groups have warned against this move, and we need to keep an independent Office of Congressional Ethics." or make your own script.)
(find your rep: http://www.house.gov/)

Jan 3

Hey SFers. These guys seem to have their stuff together. And they're running for Democratic party delegates, and we go vote on Sunday morning at 10am in the Mission. And it's a tiny lil election so nobody will be there. But I'll be there at 10. Or maybe like 10:30. Let me know if you can join me!

Jan 3

Ok, 2017! Starting off strong!
There are still many things bad about this story (Trump getting credit for saving the OCE when he really said "guys let's gut the OCE later", for one), but I'm counting this, where Americans rose up en masse and said "yes we like ethics and will fight corruption," as a good sign.
We did this! If you "wasted" an hour this morning calling a bunch of congressers, you did this! (I know I did.) Calling your people works; keep it up!
(and subscribe to http://www.dothething.info - now with 84% less me and 600% more wonderful other people posting!)

Jan 7

First of all, this is the best (warning: it is loud, and the best): https://youtu.be/Y-dMSstLDqM
Second of all, a topical KRABBY.

Jan 9

Trump's team is causing ethical problems. Again.
This time they did this:
- nominate a bunch of rich people for cabinet (most of whom haven't served any government office before)
- not send all the required disclosure forms to the Office of Government Ethics
- try to rush through confirmation hearings before the OGE can properly vet them
This is unprecedented. And if it sounds like procedural blahblah, these procedures are there for a reason. We wouldn't want to, for example, put in a Sec of Agriculture, and later find out that they own a large portion of Kraft or McDonald's. (or, more likely, find out they own a portion of some megafund that owns a chunk of some offshore bank which owns a chunk of some supplier to some company that owns a chunk of Kraft - point is, conflicts of interest are Bad, and we should know about them.)
Call your senators! If your senators are democrats, you might still call them anyway; you can also try the following, who were pretty friendly:
Johnny Isakson (R-GA) (770) 661-0999 (Senate Select Committee on Ethics chair)
Christopher Coons (D-DE) (302)736-5601 (SSCE vice-chair)
Jeff Flake (R-AZ) 602-840-1891 (I dunno, I've just been calling him a lot)
Each call takes literally less than ninety seconds. You can do 3 calls in 5 minutes. You can use the script in Sheila's post below. Do ittttttttt.
(More info)

Jan 9

also, hey: you are a person who goes to rallies now. you're a person who shows up, in person, to fight authoritarianism and corruption, to fight the downfall of our democracy, to fight for America to be better for all its people.
here is one: Bernie's hosting rallies for health care on Sunday. here is a page you can find the closest one. I'll be at SF city hall. See you there.
edit: and apparently one about climate change today at 5pm at Feinstein's office in downtown SF?
http://www.350bayarea.org/day_against_denial_170109
I'm a person who goes to rallies now, if only to be a warm body to boost counts of "N,000 people showed up to fight climate change denial."

Jan 9

Hey yo. Here right by Feinstein's SF office with the local 350.org folks, telling her to reject Tillerson, Pruitt, Zinke, and Perry.
Of *course* I have some misgivings: isn't Feinstein already against them? These signs yelling about "Big Oil" - when you say "Big (Noun)" I automatically think you're a nut, right? Should we actually ban fracking everywhere?
But, as one of my mom's co-workers would say, it's directionally right. Someone just said "we're going to be doing this a lot over the next 4 years." And that's what I'm here for. Step 437 of 73848858 for the resistance.

Jan 13

Havin' a change of mind on whether you should call reps who don't represent you. I guess the answer is no. https://www.thefourfiftyone.com/episodes/2017/1/9/episode-4-never-give-up-never-surrender
In addition to having a basically-zero effect, you might also be hurting locals by tying up the phone lines. If Senator Montana does a dumb thing, and I call Senator Montana, they will be polite and listen to me for my 30 seconds or whatever, and then hang up and do nothing. In the meantime, an actual Montanan might get a busy signal.
I know you guys have already been telling me this. Ok, I guess you're right. I think I didn't believe it because I didn't want to believe it. It seems so unfair that I can't do anything to influence Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, or really any republican congressperson, especially given how the Republican majorities are doing a ton of stuff that affects all of us. But I guess we should just try to affect them in different ways.
(or, maybe we should call them and just lie about our addresses? or bend the truth? that seems like it would come back to bite us. but I also don't want to be facing an election in four years, after the Republicans run rampant with voter suppression, abolishing ethics offices, etc, and going "well we can't possibly win any election ever again in our new one-party state, but at least I didn't call the wrong congressperson." eh. I'm leaning towards "don't do this", but I'd be interested in your opinions too.)

Jan 15

Here at a rally with Nancy Pelosi at SF city hall to ... Not take away millions of people's health care. Vote more - get out in the streets!
Edit to add hashtag: #ourfirststand

Jan 16

Ohio friends:
Sen Rob Portman (R) has been expressing doubts about repealing the Affordable Care Act (aka the ACA, aka Obamacare). Call him to tell him to keep it up, and fight repeal of the ACA. Tell your personal story (briefly) about how the ACA has helped you, if possible. (202) 224-3353
Your phone call matters. I could call him, but because I don't live in Ohio, my phone call doesn't matter. Please make this phone call in my place.
(please call even if you didn't like Obama. the ACA is not perfect, but if it is repealed, a lot of people will die; the GOP slogan is "repeal and replace", but they have no replacement in mind so they'll let you pay through the nose, or die, while they durdle about it forever.)

Jan 19

Hi friends in SF and nearby! I have to get some people for some studies in order to do a thesis and maybe graduate someday, so if you could help me out I'd really appreciate it. I will make it as convenient as possible for you. (As well as pay you $15, though I know your time is worth more than that, but it's all I can pay :-P)
Do you like traveling, neighborhoods, and learning about new cities? Wish there was a better way to learn about a place before visiting it?
Give us feedback on our Neighborhood Guides website and earn $15 for 1 hour. This site aims to bring together social media, photos, maps, and statistics to help you get a sense of a neighborhood before you visit.
Book a session here: (link) or contact Dan at (email).
This site is being created as part of research in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. Participants must be at least 18 years old.

Jan 19

also if any of you need an android phone, I've got a Nexus 5x I'm looking to sell. (it broke, I sent it for repairs figuring it wouldn't get fixed... and then they fixed it 2 months later, but I had already bought a new phone.) let's say $150.

Jan 21

SF friends: if you are looking for friends to march with, Tati and I are meeting at Four Barrel coffee (14th and Valencia) at ~4, leaving around 4:30, to catch the end of the rally/start of the march. Join us!
(I will have my phone but can't rely on having cell service, so apologies in advance if I don't respond)

Jan 21

So cool to see everyone marching, here and in other cities all over Facebook today. We ARE the majority, and this is the kind of stuff we need to do.
"The moral arc of the universe is long but it bends towards justice, even if you sometimes get these nasty power grabs from corrupt goons." - MLK, or something

Jan 22

Trump's main strategy is "just lie." It's important that we recognize this and call it as such.
And it's important to pull out completely-verifiable claims and thoroughly debunk them, so that we have a baseline estimate of who we can trust: not the president. Especially if it becomes a battle of "the press vs. the prez" - Trump actively wants you to mistrust the press, but they are way more reliable than he is.
That's why estimates of crowd sizes matter. (Politifact)
Don't all politicians lie? Sure, but to a different extent. If Obama said something, we could assume that it's, eh, half true. If Trump says something, our baseline assumption should be that it's false. Not "semi-weaselly political spin"; _completely false_.
(by taking medians of their fact-checked statements.)
Why bother now? Why not wait until it's a lie that matters?
See Klein's post, and this.

Jan 22

A SKRUB is a KRAB who thinks he's fab

Jan 25

Hey! I only know a couple people in these states, but Cheryl Saffles and Jonathan II are, and you probably know better than I do what's wrong with DeVos - so get all y'all's friends and call this guy:
Richard Burr (NC) 336.631.5125..&..202.224.3154..&.. 910.251.1058..&..828.350.2437
(and just say "I hope Senator Burr will vote no on Betsy DeVos.")
More info:
We are 3 votes away from denying confirmation to Betsy DeVos!!!
If you live in any of these states, or know someone who does, *please please please* call your Senators. If it's busy, keep trying, because phone calls are the most effective.
Susan Collins (ME) 207.622.8414..&..202.224.2523
Lamar Alexander (TN) 615.736.5129..&..202.224.4944
Lisa Murkowski (AK) 907.586.7277..&..202.224.6665
Johnny Isakson (GA) 770.661.0999..&..202.224.3643
Orrin Hatch (UT) 801.524.4380..&..202.224.5251
Richard Burr (NC) 336.631.5125..&..202.224.3154..&.. 910.251.1058..&..828.350.2437
Michael Enzi (WY) 202.224.3424
Dr. Bill Cassidy (LA) 202.224.5824
Pat Roberts (KS) 202.224.4774
Tim Scott (SC) 202.224.6121
Rand Paul (KY) 202.224.4343
(Copy/paste rather than click the share button so more people see it)

Jan 29

Hell yes SF. Heard that everyone being detained was released. These great American people, including me, will keep protesting as long as this kind of thing keeps happening. #sfoprotest

Jan 31

Your moment of hope: even Fox News viewers are on our side. (See poll answers) http://nation.foxnews.com/poll/index.html
Liberals and conservatives both: this is Bannon and Trump vs all of us.

---

ok gosh this was exhausting. not planning on doing this regularly, but I thought it was interesting to look through.

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Expose the hierarchical file system to the user.

Say it again: Expose the hierarchical file system to the user.

Or, in 2016-speak:
Expose (clapemoji) The (clapemoji) Hierarchical (clapemoji) File (clapemoji) System (clapemoji) To (clapemoji) The (clapemoji) User (clapemoji).

This one goes out to the makers of iTunes, Photos (Mac app), iPhoto, Google Photos, Mendeley, OSX, Windows, and every other piece of software that deals with your important files.

Software comes and goes. Picasa? Came and is phasing out. iPhoto's gone. iTunes is still around but useless. Flickr's still around I guess. Nook came and went. Kindle's still around, for now. What can we count on to last in the digital world?

Files. Files and folders. In a Unix (or mayyybe Windows) hierarchical file system. Picasa's dying? Fine: we can get our photos out, in the same organizational scheme they went in. You migrate your iTunes music to a new computer? Well, at least all your mp3s are still sorted by artist and album.

But if you were using iPhoto... good luck. Your photos might arrive on the new software, but they might not, because they were all stored in one giant blob called "iPhoto Library." Maybe your "albums" or whatever nonsense organizational scheme will arrive too. But if you had them in files and folders, you'd be set.

The one thing* that's lasted since the start of the modern age** of computers is the Unix file system. That's also the one thing I'd count on to still be around in some form in 50 years. And I will still want my photos and music files in 50 years.

* ok there are more
** I just made this term up, call it like 1970+?

(another dumb thing: new iphones store all photos as a photo + a video, so they move a little bit, like harry potter. guess if anything will still reliably read a photo + a video as one single file in 50 years.)

Anyway, apologies for writing a long rant; if I had more time I'd have written a shorter one. But in the meantime, Expose The Hierarchical File System To The User.

Monday, December 19, 2016

New bike: Ricardo Villalobos


Check this out! See the turquoise "Yerka" on the frame? That's where it locks/unlocks. The whole frame comes apart and, together with the seatpost, locks around something. It's pretty neat. Probably will be my new around-town bike.

Ricardo Villalobos is a Chilean-German minimal techno producer. This bike is from Chile, and kind of minimal. (but then you unlock it and it has all this hidden depth, or something!) A techno producer feels appropriate for a riding-around-town bike.

That makes this bike #3 I've assembled from parts. I'm learning here! Stats and links for my memory's sake:

Frame: Yerka XL (58cm)
Seat and post: whatever came with the frame (it's a whole locking system)
Handlebars: Oval M650 MTB Handlebar 710mm 31.8mm w/ Oury aqua grips to match the Yerka lock, cheapo stem from Bike Kitchen
Headset: Cane Creek 40 series integrated headset. Note to self: that was the wrong headset for this frame. "Integrated" means it doesn't have cups, b/c they're "integrated" into your frame. Except on mine, they weren't. Luckily, Bike Kitchen had a couple extras.
Brakes: Promax Radius caliper brakes. Stud lengths: 37mm front, 15mm rear. 60mm max reach from center of the stud to center of the pad at its lowest. Origin8 Power V-type levers, standard XLC cables/housings
Wheels: EighthInch Julian V2 wheels, white, 32h. 42mm deep rims. 100m front spacing, 120mm rear. Thickslick 700x25c tiresThese rim strips. Tubes.
Drive train: Lasco cranks (46t) and BB (VP BC73 68x103) (white), EighthInch white chain (1/8" obv), ACS main drive freewheel (16t, 1/8"), cheapo pedals from Bike Kitchen

Friday, November 11, 2016

Why is "smile!" bad? (It's not the Political Correctness Police)

(A shame-free and hopefully patronization-free education zone)

My post yesterday got a lot of good conversation going about men telling women to smile, randomly, on the street. Some commenters, and a lot more readers, probably thought "what's wrong with men telling women to smile?" (and even "oh boy, the Political Correctness Police decided you can't say yet another thing.") I get that, because when I think of a phrase as innocuous as "smile", I first think of "Smile!" Type A:

A kindly gentleman notices a lady feeling a little down, just looking for some kindness in the world, and he offers her a word of encouragement, "smile!", as in "it'll all be ok!"

"Smile!" Type A is maybe encouraging, maybe annoying. I mean, he could have just as easily said "it'll all be ok!" without making it her problem. Whatever. Maybe it's nice, maybe it's annoying.
EDIT: To clarify, don't do this. It might seem pleasant in your mind, but it's not: it's annoying and demeaning. Instead of actually caring about someone, you're just jumping in and "fixing" their problem. This is not a nice thing to do. Maybe it won't all be ok! Maybe they've got a serious issue and need to just be, for a minute! Someone else telling them how they ought to be feeling is 99% not going to make them feel better.

And the thing is, there's also "Smile!" Type B:
An imposing, skeezy looking dude leers at a woman and yells "smile!" Then:
- she smiles, and he goes, in a sleazy voice, "mmm baby there you go"
- she ignores him, and he yells at her for being deaf/ignoring him
- she says "no" and he yells at her for being "nasty" or a "fucking ugly bitch" or worse

Like, "Smile!" Type B is obviously annoying, demeaning, and/or threatening. And (here's the part I didn't realize, as a dude): women get "Smile!" Type B sooo often. Way more often than "Smile!" Type A. So if you, a dude, tell a lady to smile, they're 99% of the time correct to assume it's "Smile!" Type B, and this is annoying and/or scary (even if you meant "Smile!" Type A.)

(and remember, even "Smile!" Type A is probably kinda annoying. EDIT: is at least annoying, and usually demeaning too.)

(also, side point, I've never heard a woman tell me she likes being told to smile, and I've often heard women tell me they hate being told to smile. anecdotes, yeah, but one-sided enough that I'm pretty confident that it's fair to generalize.)

Thanks to Samantha and Kristina for examples; thanks to Tatiana for raising it to my attention at all. Men, if you wanna discuss, maybe do it here! (even reshare it, whatever.) I'm not exhausted from talking about this constantly, like the women in your life might be. Women, if I'm getting anything wrong or leaving anything out, let me know.

Wednesday, November 09, 2016

I really cannot believe this.

- The incredible power of sexism. Hillary vs the worst man I've ever seen run for president, and here we go.
- Well... maybe the republican party crashes and burns as hard as possible?
- Heyo Trump, you wanna make jobs, go ahead, make jobs. You get the best shot you can possibly have, and I know you will fail. I know in four years the unemployment rate will be higher and the average American will be worse off.
- But you'll be telling us the unemployment rate is lower, because you absolutely do not care about facts. And your goonbag conspiracy theory alt-right media buddies will keep repeating you until 49% of the country believes it again. (except maybe Glenn Beck, and good on him.) I'm not sure how we stop this.
- Man, kinda a bummer about my initials right now. Gotta spend a long time making "DJT" great again.
- Wait, so "make ___ great again" is ruined - is the word "great" ruined too? Is it a dog whistle for "get out all the black and brown people"?
- The planet is so hosed. our president, and a majority of our new congress, don't believe climate change is a thing?
- This is on you, email "scandal" reporters. Thanks to your "fair and balanced" nonsense, somehow one minor mistake ended up outweighing an endless list of lies, scams, and general terribleness.
- This is on you, right wing conspiracy theorist talk show hosts. But you're probably stoked about that.
- This is also on you, Catholic church who's reduced so many people's votes to one checkbox, "will they ban abortion?", which is so dumb for so many reasons.
- A bunch of states legalized weed. we're going to need it.
- This election is a pretty good argument against men's suffrage. And white people's suffrage. How many years did we go without women's suffrage - like 140? Let's let only women vote for the next 140. And make white people's votes count as 3/5.
- Here's an interesting idea: every election settles out to an equilibrium based on polls. in this one, the polls just underestimated trump, so the "equilibrium" ended up being in his favor.
- I'm wondering if the human difficulty with processing scale is a coping mechanism. Like, you look at all the magnitude of awfulness out there right now, and you've got to tune it out. Still, that's the same processing difficulty that led people to say "on the one hand, everything Trump's done, but on the other hand, those emails..."
- The average American is not quite this bad. But only just. (and, I mean, whatever, it's just "moral victory" at this point.) Someone on Twitter: "it's like you're ordering dinner with friends and three of them vote "pizza" and two vote "kill and eat you.""

Saturday, November 05, 2016

Knocked on 175 doors for Hillary today

Q. Why are you writing this post?
A. Mostly, to suggest that maybe you should go knock on doors too. Also (as usual) because I had a few interesting thoughts and I like to talk.

Q. 175 sounds like a lot!
A. Yes, it is. 3 * 3hr slots, a little more than 50 doors each. I don't necessarily recommend doing 9 hours in a row, but if you're fired up, whatever. You can just do 3 hours. It's a nice day outside. Have a nice walk.

Q. How much chutzpah do you need?
A. Kind of minimal, really? It felt a little out-of-body, like I don't have to be Dan now, I just have to be this automaton who knocks on doors and roughly does this script. That was interesting.

Q. How thick of a skin do you need?
A. Not really that thick. I had one cranky old lady go "you guys are really getting to be a nuisance!" and one 40ish jerk say coldly, "can you please leave now?" And then I had one super nice lady tell me I should go into politics because I have a lovely personality, and a lot of super gracious thanks. I'd say it was about 20:3:1 ok:really great:bad responses.

Q. Why this election?
A. Not because Hillary is The Best Ever. (She's fine.) But because the gap between the candidates is the biggest I have ever seen. I am more sure than I've ever been that this vote is the correct one.

Q. Is this really a good use of your time?
A. Beats me. A lot of people were not home. I have no idea how many extra votes I brought in today. One guy somewhere said, though, that an hour of volunteering brings in on average 5 more votes. So, kinda, I voted 45 times today! That's way more than I would have otherwise! (I have no idea where that 5/hr comes from. I'm gonna run with it though.)

Q. What's another reason I should vote?
A. Because if you only vote sometimes, you'll get on the list I had today, the sometimes-voter list, AKA the list of "we think you'll vote for us but we're not sure you'll actually get out and vote, therefore we're going to canvass and phone you a bunch to make sure you actually vote!" If you vote all the time, nobody'll bug you.

Q. Did you feel ethically weird doing this?
A. Yes, of course! I feel like ads on the internet are a monstrosity, and that one of our inalienable rights, generally, should be the right to peace and quiet. I guess I consider this an extreme measure for an extreme time where, according to 538, we may have to play two-bullet Russian Roulette on Tuesday.

Q. Don't you think that's overdramatic?
A. Maybe. I also think it's quite plausible that President Trump could start World War 3. The best case scenario is we do nothing for four years, and given climate change (among other big risks), we can't really afford to do even that.

Q. What was the most fun part of this thing?
A. Probably batch 3, when they upgraded me to "pretty advanced canvasser" and sent me on a difficult mission: talk to a bunch of people who were mostly inside an apartment building in Hazelwood. This required sneaking in through a back door, aided by a kind resident I met outside. Most of the people were kinda old and kinda poor. A lot of em were real nice, and I felt a little James Bond.

Q. Tell me some other thoughts you had.
A. So when we bug you to goddamn actually go vote, we're talking to System 1, the fast one. We're using all kinds of tricks because they're like one percent more likely to make you actually do it. Like, help you make a plan to go vote. ("I'm going to stop at the polling station on the way to work, and then I'll get coffee at the Starbucks next door and go on to work.") Or, make you promise me (a stranger) that you'll go vote. But I feel weird talking to your System 1, so I keep feeling like I have to make excuses and reasons that I'm actually talking to System 2. Like, "some people find it helpful to make a plan." Or "someone said I should tell you this." We all know that you're a hyper-rational System 2, but like let's just futz through this game, just for me, c'mon please?, that (secretly) tricks your System 1.

Q. That was interesting. Another, please.
A. It's nice that we had flyers to hand out. That way we could have a pretty common, no-conflict way to wrap up the conversation, or give you an easy out if you don't want to talk to me but don't want to be a dick. (Thanks, by the way.) It was a nice way to save face. As usual, human interactions need more ways to save face.

Q. One more deep thought?
A. Man, this is totally an information problem! Why did some people say "6 people already canvassed me, go away"? Why did we not get them off the dang list already?

Q. That wasn't deep, that was nerd-rage-shallow. Give me a deeper thought.
A. Sure: plausible nonpartisanship. Sometimes I'd knock and people would say "who is it?" and I kept trying different options. Like, maybe "A volunteer to help get out the vote". I kinda wish my little flyers didn't even say Hillary on them. Of course it's pro-Hillary; we're targeting people who are likely to vote Hillary. But it'd be way easier if I could be plausibly nonpartisan.
This is weird, right, because if I were trying to save the US from Osama, or King Jong-Un, or even Martin Shkreli, we could all agree, yeah, good thing to do, good on you. But as soon as the republicans grab one thing and the democrats grab one thing, all of a sudden it's holy war. I just want to save the US from an actually bad guy (who even most of the Republicans repudiate!) but as soon as I say "no Trump" then all of a sudden I'm "partisan" and you can comfortably ignore my viewpoint.

Q. Why hasn't anyone made any bridge "No Trump" jokes?
A. whoop, looks like they did. ehh, statistician humor.

Friday, October 28, 2016

Wedding planning megapost

Tati and I planned a wedding this past summer. It went great! As a result, I want to tell you all about how to do it. However, I don't actually know that much.

Big things I know

  • Get as much time with your people as possible. We had a venue that only let us use it from 6pm to 10:45pm, so we booked an afterparty until 2am, a brunch the next day at 11am, and a rehearsal dinner the day before. These things don't have to be fancy. All your people traveled from all over, make it worth it! (and if they get tired, they don't have to go to the extra parties.)
  • It's all fine, seriously.
  • You get a right hand man or woman. Use em. (It's even better if they've already done a wedding themselves.) My friends Daniel and Killian were over the top helpful during the day itself. It's the little things: they can get you water or food or a drink when you're busy chatting with everyone, deal with small snafus that come up, find your stuff.
    • Notably, they knew it was too hot for me to wear my three piece suit, so they brought me my vest during the dancing so I could change out the jacket for that.
    • Also, found chapstick to put on my finger so my wedding ring would fit on, because, surprise, my finger's bigger than it used to be?
  • Do you. Don't worry about it. It's all fine.
  • Oh, and in the process of doing you, get as many of your friends involved as you can. A friend was our officiant, and it was way better than any rando-officiant's ceremony would be. Another friend bartended, and was both super competent and super fun.

Things for budget conscious people (who isn't?)

We were like somewhat budget conscious. But not really, because we can afford not to be, and you only do it once, and we were out of town and busy with stuff so were happy to pay for a couple things that we maybe could have handled cheaper. It worked out well and pretty minimally stressful for us.
  • The big decisions you get to make, money-wise are:
    • How many people? Weddings seem to come in about 3 sizes: ~40, ~120, and 200+. If you want 200+, good luck.
    • Do you want a summer Saturday? Everything will be more expensive. You can get big discounts by not doing it on Saturday, or not doing it in the summer.
    • How much will your venue + caterer + booze cost? Phipps Conservatory, for example, costs $3000, plus $90/person (at least) for catering. If your venue lets you do your own catering and alcohol, that is a big win. (our catering was about $45/person. drinks + bartender for our ~100 ppl was about $15/person.)
  • The small decisions you get to make are mostly about if there's anything you don't care about being fancy-wedding? Like, you can save $1000+ if you do any of these:
    • Have it in a family member's backyard or other free place
    • Low-key catering (Indian food prices quoted to us were $15-45 per person; the higher end included all service, tablecloths, etc, the lower end was just the food.)
    • Super low key catering (I've heard good things about food trucks. And I would think it is totally cool if you got Chipotle.)
    • Simple photographer (no "getting ready" pics, no second photographer, no videographer.)
    • Simple (non-"wedding") dress
    • DIY anything. But! Don't actually DIY. Do-it-someone-else's-self. And only if they really want to, or if it will be seriously no work. Like, my mom wanted to make centerpieces. It was nice! It saved us some money, too. But more than that, it was cool that she wanted to make a contribution like that, and she was on top of it so much that we didn't even have to think. Similarly, my friend Killian (the same! we have great friends :) did a drawing for our program, but that was easily done ahead of time.
  • An afterparty can probably be just about free. Ours just had a $500 minimum our guests had to meet. (I think this was an unusually good deal; I think b/c of the package deal with the brunch.)

Things that are small but I want to bring them up

  • If you're a dude, the morning of your wedding day might be just yourself wandering around while your wife goes and gets her hair done. That's an interesting time.
  • Actually the ceremony is pretty emotionally intense! I cried a lot right after. That was surprising.
  • If you can go see them DJ somewhere beforehand and it's the kind of fun you want people having, that's great. (our DJ did one night a week at a college bar, so I went to see him. It was silly, I was the oldest person there, but they were having a blast and he seemed right on top of the crowd.)
  • We got to try out a bunch of Indian restaurant-caterers by telling them we're thinking of getting wedding catering from them. Often they'll bring you in to try all the different foods they offer, and it's usually free. This was fun.
  • Oh, choosing who to invite is really hard, but we should as a society agree that you don't get to be even a little bit mad about not getting invited to anyone's wedding ever. Ok? Good.
Anyway, especially for my friends who are getting married relatively soon, and especially if you're getting married in Pittsburgh, ask me for plenty of advice about anything. I am not real expert at this, but our wedding went even better than I'd hoped, and I do like to talk.

Thursday, October 27, 2016

85% heroes

A friend recently posted about Michael Crichton and how he's great. He's pretty great: he wrote a bunch of super cool books, all pretty smart, thoroughly researched, and real easy to read. (Jurassic Park, The Andromeda Strain, Sphere, among others.)

But! He also got like kinda deep into climate change denial. Everyone's got their own beliefs, etc, and he's allowed to be wrong. But his novel State of Fear, in particular, may have done some real damage. A lot of news is more opinion than fact these days, and a super-popular writer is likely to influence people more than a hundred academic studies. In particular, it shifts the Overton window (the window of beliefs you can have without being considered "extreme" or "radical"). By writing a major novel in which climate change denial is in fact the correct position, and then sticking with that belief, he's made it politically reasonable to believe "humans are not causing climate change."

(of course, numerous particularly right wing pundits and politicians are constantly working to shift the Overton window to constantly crazier beliefs, and yes the current batch of Republicans (including theselie more than liberals currently do (here's a couple more) (plus popular pundits) (yes I'm cherrypicking once we get outside the pres/vp and congress but I don't know how to pick so I just used this list for liberals and this list for conservatives)

Back to Crichton! Ok, so dude's dangerously wrong about one thing. And yeah, gotta fight that incorrectness hard. But he's still a great writer, so we can appreciate him for that. Maybe he's not Jesus #2, but he can still be an 85% hero.

(hell, my heroes are 85% too. David Byrne was a bit of a jerk to his bandmates, Bowie spent years coked out of his mind (which I'm more likely to give him a pass on b/c he wasn't hurting anyone else but w/e), Kurt Vonnegut didn't seem to think women were worth writing, and even the Dalai Lama's just the latest in a series of supreme dictators.*)

So, I guess, let's not throw out Crichton and let's not throw out my heroes. In the age of the Internet, it's harder to find anyone who's 100% perfect. The sooner we stop trying, the sooner we can stop excommunicating anyone who's only 85%, the sooner we can accept and listen and grow together as a country and even a world.

* speaking of Vonnegut not writing women, look at me: my heroes are nearly all white men. ok, throw in Tom Robbins, Terry Gilliam, David Lynch, and Karin Dreijer Andersson, and we're down to 87% men. I mention this not to self-flagellate, but to ask, as always, for recommendations of women or POC artists or personalities that I might like if I like these folks.

Friday, October 07, 2016

Oh man voting in California

EDIT: scroll to the bottom, I posted a fuller list of who I voted for.

This is a thing! You gotta seriously bone up to vote right here. (whether it is a good idea or not to make us vote on so many things is a different story (it's not) but I guess given what we got we might as well make the most of it.)

I'll start with the California state propositions, mostly because I found ballot.fyi and like it a lot. I won't say much about any proposition if they've already said it better.

But if you don't even have that much time and you want to delegate your vote to me:

51 Yes (money for schools): seems like it's not the best school bill but it's a school bill and they've been out of money for a while.
52 Yes (hospital thing): it's a formality
53 No (state funding requiring more votes and maybe stop a train): gosh no guys come on
54 Yes (bills available on internet): simple yes EDIT: actually no?
55 Yes (tax the rich): yes always
56 Yes (tax tobacco incl vapes): sure
57 Yes (make it easier to get parole for nonviolent criminals): slight yes? I generally favor less prison time and more rehab and this seems in that direction. There may be nuance here that I'm not well-versed enough to get into. #CaliforniaVoting
58 Yes (allow bilingual classes): This seems good b/c it'd give more control back to local folks to let them figure out what would work best in their situation. More leeway usually seems like a good thing to me.
59 Yes (does citizens united suck?) yes! this apparently doesn't matter but still vote yes b/c citizens united does suck!
60 No (requiring condoms on porn stars): nope, which is counterintuitive maybe, but porn is already safe and this apparently would be bad for pornmakers. To be an educated voter in California, you gotta know about porn too.
61 No (complicated drug pricing thing): slight no; artificially futzing with drug price markets tends to mess things up more than it helps
62 Yes (repeal the death penalty): hell yes!
63 Yes (more checks for buying ammo): yes. Just heard a good podcast; summary: better background checks and regulations are the best way to prevent gun deaths. I'm sold: I don't want to take anyone's guns anymore. But I do want better background checks and regulations. (at least license them like cars?)
64 Yes (legalize marijuana): hell yes! (and if you're concerned it'll become clown town, look: it's already basically legal here anyway)
65 No (plastic bag revenue goes to environmental things instead of stores): slight no? this just seems dumb. you charge me 10 cents per bag, just keep the 10 cents, don't put aside a nickel for some tax for vague environmental things.
66 No (quicken the death penalty): hell no!
67 Yes (ban plastic bags): this overlaps with 65 confusingly, but basically if you like the way that SF is now, with no plastic bags, vote yes on 67.

whew! that was a thing. that's about 1/3 of my ballot; the rest to follow.

Let me know if you know any good sources for similar breakdowns of SF local stuff!

EDIT: Here's a more thorough list of who I voted for! And even if you don't trust me, I still have a lot of tallies of who some other local groups supported, so that's maybe useful. Note also that I changed my position on ... at least one of the above.

Saturday, October 01, 2016

Can politics be "just politics"?

Been struggling with a couple of interrelated questions:
1. can we just discuss every issue calmly and rationally?
2. can we be friends with people who have some beliefs that are really bad?
These lead me to some more questions, but I'll get to that.

1. Can we discuss every issue calmly and rationally?

For the first ~20 years of my life, discussing things calmly and rationally was my goal. There's an issue, let's disinterestedly look at all the evidence and find the logical explanation or solution. If you're yelling or being aggressive or interrupting or whatever, stop it.

Over my 20s, I've seen the flaws in that:
1. "aggressive" is subjective, and in a lot of arenas, white people and men can get away with a lot of things that women and people of color can't. (other biases apply here too, but those are the most common.) Makes for an uneven debate playing field. (especially if you then pretend it's all even and rational!)
2. debating is slow. sometimes things don't change, or don't change fast enough, with calm reason and intellectual debate. I'd rather have angry arguments and a quick end to, say, slavery, than a slow and methodical and rational decision that makes everyone feel good.
3. rationality assumes disinterestedness: saying something is "just politics" is like saying it's "just sports" - that we can mostly ignore it. That I can like the Cavs and you can like the Warriors and who cares. That's a luxury some people don't have. (e.g. Black Lives Matter right now)
4. "objectivity" can be a facade: sometimes people hide behind the facade of "being objective" when they're really pushing some other thing (e.g. fox news)
5. debating isn't easy: sometimes debating something causes more problems than it solves. An example here is how much you question someone reporting a sexual assault or other traumatic event.
6. sometimes people are devil's advocate goons, like white guys saying "well, but thought experiment devil's advocate, what IF women frequently report that they got raped just to get attention?" Your "argument" isn't actually disinterestedly bringing new information to the table, you're just trying to discredit someone or provoke a response. Sometimes you're trying to provoke a forfeit: where someone says "geez, I can't deal with you anymore" and leaves, and then you strut around triumphant. It's kind of like DDOSing a server: if one man tries to argue that to one woman, they can calmly discuss it (maybe; see the previous point), but if 10 male college freshmen in a gender studies class try to argue it against one woman in the class, the woman may just be overwhelmed and out of time or emotional energy to deal with them all. (or worse: 1000 people on the internet!) Maybe this is the same point as #4.

2. Can we be friends with people who have some beliefs that are really bad?

"I know politics bore you, but I feel like a hypocrite talking to you and your racist friend." - the ever prescient Johns Linnell and Flansburgh of TMBG.

A friend on Facebook, who has some serious skin in the game, whose life would be made waaay worse if Trump were elected and did everything he said he would, said:
When I sometimes wander into other peoples' Facebook conversations about this election, I see a fair amount of sentiment along the lines of "Well, we can all agree to disagree about Trump or Clinton or whatever, but we're still friends and we still love each other." My question is: How is that fucking possible? Because I'm pretty certain that anyone voting for Trump is indicating that my life and the lives of many of my friends have no value to them. How could I possibly keep including that person in my life?
This is a more extreme version of #1. Not only can we not discuss something calmly, we can't even separate the person from the belief. And in some cases, we shouldn't. Some beliefs are so abhorrent that we oughta have some kind of punitive reaction to people holding them. It's rare and gently handled, though; maybe you practice some kind of collective conversational shunning whenever this problem comes up, and individually you privately tell the person that you feel this belief is really repugnant.

3. When should the answer to #1 and #2 be "yes", and when should it be "no"?

Put another way, what should be sacred, or what should be taboo? A good read: "Socially Enforced Thought Boundaries," by someone named Birguslatro (mildly difficult - they drop a "hermeneutic", but it's near the end so you can still get it even if "hermeneutic" loses you as it does me. btw, if you really understand what "hermeneutic" means, please explain it to me sometime.) Basically, we can debate about some things, but some things are so core to our existence that you can't even question them.

This is what John Lennon ran into when he offhandedly remarked that "we're bigger than Jesus." It was true, in a lot of metrics: more people were listening to the Beatles than going to church. And it wasn't meant to be inciting or arrogant; he wasn't saying "we should be bigger than Jesus" or "we're better than Jesus." He just poked one of the sacred taboos: don't compare yourself to Jesus at all.

Similarly, just heard a Reply All podcast about a guy who was pretty thoroughly exiled from his Orthodox Jewish community after he decided he wanted to read modern books and watch movies and didn't fully believe all the stuff they were telling him. It's rather heartbreaking. And just for violating some of the (many!) sacred things in his world.

OTOH, new movie coming out called Denial, about a holocaust denier and a public battle about how we can prove the holocaust ever happened. I think we all agree this guy (the denier) is an ass clown and shouldn't really be allowed to call a debate about this. "The holocaust happened" is pretty sacred.

The Birguslatro article I pointed to above argues that our set of universal sacrednesses should be minimal, unchanging, and relatively unconnected to your daily life. And methods to enforce them should be as minimal as possible. Sounds good to me.

So, "the holocaust happened" is sacred, but not "we shouldn't have invaded Iraq" or "police should wear body cameras" or "we need more bike lanes." We can debate all these things.

4. What's the trend in sacredness now?

I'm not real sure, but the number of things that are sacred seems to be growing. At least on my Facebook feed. People are getting fed up with debating to the point that, instead of arguing against something, they just dismiss it or violently protest it because it has broken a taboo. We're treating opposing views with ridicule or vitriol, not debate. An example: "I hope the concept of cultural appropriation is a passing fad", in which Lionel Shriver discusses a party where apparently everyone wore mini sombreros, and the reaction was official sanctions, expulsion from dorms, etc. Similarly, some dumb students somewhere protested because their cafeteria was serving "inauthentic" sushi. Isolated incidents, but they point to a growing circle of sacredness: arguments that are wrong before they've even been considered, people shut off, disproportionate and punitive responses.

N. N. Taleb shows how this can happen: "The Most Intolerant Wins - The Dictatorship Of The Small Minority." If you're short on time, skip towards the bottom to the chapter called "Popper's Paradox." An example is the Kosher food thing: people keeping Kosher is super rare these days, but stores will stock all kinds of Kosher things to cater to this 0.2% of the population, because, well, might as well supply 100% of people instead of 99.8%.

Taleb's a little cranky, and Shriver seems to miss a bit of history, I'll give you that. It'd be different, for example, if there weren't a publishing industry full of editors telling POC authors that their characters "aren't relatable" (because they aren't white) and then here goes the white author getting published writing black characters. But these are changes that need to happen within the publishing industry (and meanwhile reported out to the wider world), not by getting the whole world together to publicly shame someone who wrote a black character badly. And it's tough these days to distinguish between Islam-we-should-tolerate and Islam-we-shouldn't.

Every Muslim I know, Rumi, Sufism, and moderate Islam are in the first camp. Osama bin Laden, the Saudi government, Salafism, and Wahhabism are in the second camp. But... the stuff in between is actually tricky! Where's the line between allowing women to wear burkas because they want to, and making sure they're not being coerced into doing so? Is there actually something different and more dangerous about Islam, at its core, than Christianity or Buddhism or Jainism, as Sam Harris argues? But we've got to be able to discuss these things. As a society, and as individuals.

5. So to answer questions #1 and #2, yes, mostly.

We can calmly discuss most things and should do so more than we have been. We can mostly be friends with most people who hold most other opinions, even if those are really crummy, unless they breach our taboos (and even then, we can let them know how much of a dick they're being).

I guess I'm asking, if you can: reduce your sacrednesses and drop your taboos, and be kinder to people who break them.

Oh my gosh do not stop reading now if you have read this far you gotta read part 6.

6. But hold up, you gotta be careful.

My answer in part 5 is not a license for you to commit errors-of-rationality 1-6 above.
1. Listen. Do not ignore the slantedness of your playing field! Don't talk over women or tell them they're being too pushy. Don't assume you know what other people's experience is, or what should and shouldn't offend them. Listen.
2. Know when something is serious enough you've got to abandon the slow, rational track.
3. Realize that you might be discussing something that's "just a game" to you, but isn't "just a game" to them. Realize that might make them defensive. Their defensiveness doesn't mean you "win."
4. If you're interested in the outcome, check yourself before you start an argument. When you say "I'm just trying to be objective," do you mean "I'm just trying to get you to agree that I'm right"? Also check yourself if you feel good while you're arguing; that little nugget of tasty rage-adrenaline sprinkled with righteousness might be poisoning your whole 
5. If you want to debate something and the other person doesn't want to, consider that that might be ok. Especially if you know they've been through this before: they might just be tired of it. Also: someone else's refusal to engage does not mean you "win."
6. Ask permission before playing devil's advocate. Not saying it's a necessarily bad technique for arriving at the truth, but consider it a warning sign when the words "devil's advocate" leave your mouth: you might be just being a dick.

(Six rules may be too many. Particularly, 3 and 5 might be the same, and 4 and 6 might be the same. But even if four rules is too many, I could boil this down to 2: 1. Listen, 2. when you're debating, you either both win or you both lose.)

After all, The enemy isn't leftism or social justice. The enemy is epistemic vice. (and conservatives, if you've given up on my blog, maybe try this; yes he's endorsing not-Trump, but in the goal of a healthy conservative branch long-term.) Skip to the end, part VIII. Epistemology is how we know what we know; epistemic vice is abdicating responsibility for critical thinking.

"The long range plan has to combine a short-term need to neutralize immediate would-be tyrants with a long-term need to slowly encourage epistemic virtue so that we don’t have to keep putting out fires."

7. What do I do about Facebook?
I've been running a little experiment to see what it is about News feed that bothers me. Maybe I should keep Newsfeed but unfollow certain folks. That's not real satisfying. Maybe I'll try the "see less like this" and trust the algorithm to sort it out?
Thing is, I'm planning on keeping Twitter, and probably Reddit and Feedly for that matter. I guess I've just curated them better? And I kept people on Facebook for the diversity-of-thought angle, but now I'm thinking the harm done by encouraging me to get out the rage cannon has undone the openness that might come from understanding different people. Little blips of text and pictures don't help you understand people very well, anyway.

Footnote 1: by the way, if you haven't, this would be a good time to read I can tolerate anything except the outgroup. One of the few rando-internet-posts that's brilliant enough to keep linking people to.
Footnote 2: thanks to Chris Stucchio for pointing me to a lot of these links.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

More pieces of thoughts from notebooks

It's easiest to get along with someone when you're going through the same challenges. I guess this is just a rephrasing of "the best way to make friends is to suffer together."

There's an "investment" in academia that's nicer than "just a job." Grad school is all us going through this same grand challenge. I get why people want to stay in it. I suppose the thing to do is get a job that lets you feel that way too.

You can never thank everyone as much as you want.

Offloading mental work to parts of the brain that are good at things. This is a whole topic. I was thinking about it in the context of emotional regulation, but then just heard about it on a podcast: a memory expert talking about how he memorizes decks of cards by associating each with a famous person, and then telling stories about all the people. Way easier than trying to straight-up memorize letters and numbers. (and different than the old trick of chunking, which also helps.)
But back to emotional regulation: one thing I've learned (from therapists, mostly) is that it's important to be gentle and kind to all the people in your head. I'm not talking about multiple personality disorder, or tulpas, just the common thing where you have lots of sometimes-conflicting thoughts in there. But I'm calling all those thoughts/voices "people", because they're all just versions of yourself at different times. And we're good at being kind to people and incorporating them into a group; we're less good at incorporating facts and opinions. (and we're not often kind to ourselves.)

The problem about rules changing is when they exclude more people. Rise above tribalism. More on this maybe, if I can form my swirling thoughts into a coherent narrative.

We used to tell kids "follow your dreams! you can be anything you want!" That's a little bit true but also very misleading and not at all the thing I'm going to tell my kids. Some things that are true:
- you can maybe be anything. You cannot be everything. You've got to narrow it down. But narrowing it down is hard because:
- some things will not work, due to inherent limitations (short NBA star, etc.)
- some things will not ever fit your passion. You don't know this until you try. Imagine your passion as a little puppy, and you're trying to figure out what this puppy likes.
- some things will fit your passion, but later. It's a puppy, not a big dog; it'll change over time.
Passion does exist! But it's a thing you grow and actively discover, not a thing you decide or passively discover.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

the internet: bringing us together and pushing us apart since Jan 1, 1970

Some things that are on my mind:
Chris Arnade's tweets - I don't know who this guy is, just stumbled on his posts, and couldn't stop reading. I guess here's a decent starter. He's a reporter who used to live in the "front row" (wall street) and now travels among the "back row" (small cities throughout non-coastal America).
An interview with Will MacAskill - guy behind 80,000 hours and Giving What We Can and philosophy prof. You don't have to listen to all of it (it's long) but you should (it's great) - the one point that's relevant to this post was about tribalism (especially in election season). Why should your view on abortion have anything to do with your economic policy?

With that context, sleepy and trying to wake up, I opened Facebook. Came across a post by a family member (keepin' this all super vague b/c public blog and don't wanna embarrass anyone I guess) expressing regret over some recent riots that came out of a vigil for a black guy killed by police. Other family (some close, some less close) jumped on, "yeah it's so sad," "violence is not the way," etc. And I found my mind doing a couple things:
1. assuming that those family members were all therefore invalidating the struggle of black people to not get killed
2. getting angry because black people are getting killed!
3. spiraling into rage, thinking about my other friends who are posting about black people being killed
4. writing off my family members' opinions because they're so sheltered in their white middle class lives or something

and... that's mostly ridiculous, to say the least:
1. man, who knows! I know that some of the family involved (again, staying super vague) care, and get it, about black people getting killed. posting about riots (happening in a place they're living) doesn't mean they don't believe protests are justified.
2. ok, this is not ridiculous
3. ... but this is silly. I'm getting a daily dose of anger fuel without doing anything about it. Like, I see posts running the gamut from "black people are getting killed, that is bad" -> "holy cow this is actually really bad" -> "if you disagree, you are wrong" -> "if you disagree, you are bad" -> "if you even less-than-fully-agree, you are bad". The later steps are usually said through sarcasm, not outright. Somewhere between "holy cow this is actually really bad" and "if you disagree, you are bad", this stops being useful and starts being tribalism.
4. oh gosh! first of all, I'm living in the biggest bubble city there is. I guess I see more poor and not-white people on a daily basis than they do, but I can't say I interact meaningfully. Second of all, what good is it to close yourself off from someone you disagree with? Third, I mean, these are family relationships, too, and those are important, and yeah you can disagree with someone's politics without writing them off as a person, but it's hard when you're in the "if you disagree, you are bad" mental state.

The result of all this is that I'm angry, and feeling closed off from family members. (and nothing has happened to help stop black people getting killed by police.) Maybe, looking at this real optimistic-like, I should focus on this as a practice opportunity to:
- remember not to take anyone beyond their word - if you say "riots are bad" it doesn't mean "the thing that caused their riots isn't bad"
- not close off, in case people do disagree with me
- love my family despite disagreeing with them sometimes

Well, at least I'm awake.

EDIT: to be clear, I didn't mean this post to be about the riots or police violence at all. I was trying to say more something like "Facebook surfaces the angriest views on anything to me, which changes my reactions enough that I'm unable to even relate to people normally; this is frustrating" and "I wish I could read my friends' news in a way that doesn't bathe me in anger." To be further clear, my points #1-4 above (the first time I talk about them) are mostly wrong, and I referenced them all again a second time to disprove them all. Anyway, if this post makes you want to discuss anything about riots or police violence, then sure, let's do so, but I don't mean to be taking any particular stand here. (well, ok, I guess I'm taking the stand that black people getting killed unjustly by police is bad. but that's hardly a stand.)

also: I was trying to anonymize everyone, and I'm pretty sure I succeeded in anonymizing it enough that an internet rando couldn't google the people involved, but obviously didn't anonymize it to the people involved (or people who know the people involved, or who also got the shared facebook post.) I'm not real sure how to do this. I could say "I saw a post from a person about an event, and it made me think ____" but then it's like reading math: so abstract it's hard to tell what's even going on. not good reading, anyway. Also, when I say "some family members", the wrong family members might think it's them. Open to suggestions on how to do this better.

also also: who am I writing for here? good question. first of all, me. there's a reason I hardly ever try to publicize this blog (and start all sorts of new ones for sub-audiences). I guess (and this is an unintentional thing I'm only now realizing) second of all might be pretty close friends and pretty close family? folks who know me and my context and life and might be interested in ramblings?
It's the kind of thing where it'd be nice if all my close peers were around a lot and I could process my feelings through them, but now we live all over the place.
And I want it to be super opt-in-whenever; like I don't want to facebook push it to you, but if you want to go check a blog, go ahead.
But it does leave me with a super uncertain audience, which means I'm sometimes not sure about who I can talk to about what. Eh.

(thanks to my mom for an interesting conversation about all this)

Anyway, if anything I say makes you feel bad in any way, or if it seems like a thinly veiled dig at you behind your back, let me know, let's talk it out.

Sunday, September 11, 2016

A bunch of small thoughts from an old notebook

1. Listen to the "autism isn't what I signed up for" episode if Death, Sex, and Money podcast. Oh god! That's the most terrifying thing I've heard recently (b/c possibility times harm is really high).

2. Apparently there are people who pretend to be soldiers, wear combat gear, etc, just around town to get discounts, praise, etc. Uh, OK. And apparently there are people who like to find these people and discover that they're lying and publicly and loudly embarrass them. Again, uh, OK. They call their crusade "Stolen Valor." Predictably, sometimes they're wrong, and they just make a scene screaming at some poor old guy who couldn't answer their impromptu inquisition to their satisfaction.

I guess this is a perfect example of all kinds of terribleness that happens on the internet, ostensibly for a noble cause, but in reality caused by people's love of feeling superior and casting out the infidel.

3. Is there something to intermittent fasting? For general health and living longer because your body cleans up all the nasty damaged pre pre pre cancerous cells?

4. I just have one sentence written down and I forget the context: "the political discourse is more dangerous than ISIS." Upon reflection... Yeah, I can see that. Like if you pull some trick to get elected but then it also lessens public trust in government, and then we fail to pass a carbon tax or something. Like, if you're trying to drive a car a thousand miles, the most dangerous thing that can happen isn't a bumpy road, it's if you let your engine degrade. Eh, this requires some kind of large scale thinking to look at relative risks of various large problems. Gosh, wish I knew someone who did that :P

5. "You have to do a hard thing in your 20s. Grad school was/is OK for me I guess." - tongue in cheek, but like, one of the real upsides of grad school is I know I've been challenging myself and haven't wasted the last 5 years, career wise.